NEERAJ SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./ PRIN. SECY. HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/68/2025 · 2025-01-16
Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114042 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 114042 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2748-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 68 of 2025 Petitioner :- Neeraj Singh And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy. Housing And Urban Planning Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suryansh Narula,Amit Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Puneet Chandra,Shobhit Mohan Shukla Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard Ms. Surabhi Rawat holding brief of Shri Suryansh Narula, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Manish Mishra, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Shri Shobhit Mohan Shukla, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3 and Shri Mohit Chandra holding brief of Shri Puneet Chandra, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 4.
2. If there is no legal impediment, then, the opposite party no. 4, which is a statutory authority, should satisfy the recovery certificate issued by RERA and deposit the due amount within a reasonable time, say, within a period of one month failing which the District Magistrate/Collector, Lucknow would be obliged to recover the same and remit to RERA so that the petitioner may receive it.
3. This of course is without prejudice to the rights of the opposite party no. 4 if the proceedings out of which the recovery certificate arises have been assailed in appeal etc., although, the petitioner's counsel says that no appeal has been filed within the statutory period.
4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is
disposed of. . (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 16.1.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench