Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11404 (JHR)

RAMESH MURMU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3415/2025 · 2025-05-02

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:13307] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3415 of 2025 ------ Ramesh Murmu, aged about 34 years, S/o Babla Murmu, R/o Village- Chilgo (Upertola), P.O.- Amrapara, P.S.- Amrapara, District- Pakur, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Om Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-02-05-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Amrapara P.S. Case No.06 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109 of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner attempted to murder Kangoi Marandi. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that all the injuries allegedly sustained by the victim are simple in nature. It is then submitted that there is a land dispute between the parties. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.01.2025 as mentioned in para-11 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family member in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Pakur in connection with Amrapara P.S. Case No.06 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family member in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/