Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11404 (HP)

M/S JHS SVENDGAARD LABORATORIES LTD v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/5439/2025 · 2025-07-29

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:HHC:14156 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 5439 of 2025 Decided on : 29.07.2025 M/s JHS Sevendgaard Laboratories Ltd. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vishal Bindra, Advocate. Mr. Amrish Kumar, Senior Executive (HR) of the petitioner, in person. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 5. Mr. Rajinder Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.6. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, respondent No.6, in person. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Mr. Rakesh Kumar, respondent No.6 and Mr. Amrish Kumar, Senior Executive (HR) of the petitioner, are present in the Court in person. They have informed the Court that the 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:14156 petitioner has amicably settled the matter with respondent No.6. Respondent No.6, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, has stated in the open Court that in the light of the settlement that has been arrived into between him and the petitioner, he has no objection, in case, the petition is allowed, as prayed for and orders Annexure P-2, Annexure P-3 and Annexure P-5, are quashed and set aside, as prayed for. 2. In the light of the fact that the matter stands amicably settled between the parties, this petition is disposed of by setting aside orders Annexure P-2, dated 28.06.2023, Annexure P-3, dated 28.10.2024 and Annexure P-5 (colly), dated 10.03.2025 & 15.02.2025, so that now the settlement arrived into between the petitioner and private respondent, can be given effect to. 3. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the cost imposed upon the petitioner by the Court on 23.06.2025, has also been paid to the private respondent. Private respondent acknowledges this fact. 3 2025:HHC:14156 5. As prayed for, the petitioner-Company is granted liberty to withdraw the amount, which has been deposited by it before learned Labour Commissioner. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 29, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)