IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 240 Satish Kumar and others State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. Present: Mr. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present petition for directing the respondents to grant petitioners the pay band at Department i.e. Rs.10300 view of judgments dated 01.02.2018 and 11.12.2018 (Annexures P4 and P5). 2. Learned counsel draws the attention of this Court to averm in para 2 on merit of the reply dated 01. there was an anomaly which though has been removed by the State while implementing the reports of 6 that in view of Punmjab and others, rectified from the date 3. The hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the respondents shall consider and decide the matter taking note of the aforesaid IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-877 Date of decision: 01.04.2025 and others ..Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Nitesh Singla, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition for directing the respondents to grant petitioners the pay band at par with Group Instructors working in the Department i.e. Rs.10300-34800 with grade pay of Rs.4800 w.e.f. 01.12.2011 in view of judgments dated 01.02.2018 and 11.12.2018 (Annexures P4 and P5). Learned counsel draws the attention of this Court to averm in para 2 on merit of the reply dated 01.08.2022 wherein it has been there was an anomaly which though has been removed by the State while implementing the reports of 6th Pay Commission, that in view of the judgment in the case of Manjit Kaur and others vs. State of Punmjab and others, CWP-19655-2020, decided on 14.02.2024, rectified from the date it occurred. The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the respondents shall consider and decide the matter taking note of the aforesaid IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 877-2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.04.2025 ..Petitioners ..Respondents JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition for directing the respondents to par with Group Instructors working in the 34800 with grade pay of Rs.4800 w.e.f. 01.12.2011 in view of judgments dated 01.02.2018 and 11.12.2018 (Annexures P4 and P5). Learned counsel draws the attention of this Court to averments made 8.2022 wherein it has been admitted that there was an anomaly which though has been removed by the State while Pay Commission, however, the same, he states anjit Kaur and others vs. State of 2020, decided on 14.02.2024, needs to be aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the respondents shall consider and decide the matter taking note of the aforesaid judgment within a Prayer made in the present petition for directing the respondents to par with Group Instructors working in the 34800 with grade pay of Rs.4800 w.e.f. 01.12.2011 in ents made admitted that there was an anomaly which though has been removed by the State while he states anjit Kaur and others vs. State of needs to be aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the respondents shall ASHOK KUMAR 2025.04.03 12:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-877-2021 (O&M) -2- period of 4 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 4. The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioners are found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to their interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to them and shall contain reasons, whereupon they shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) 01.04.2025 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2025.04.03 12:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document