GULZAR ALIAS MOHD GULZAR v. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE UDHAM SINGH NAGAR
WPCRL/2137/2021 · 2025-05-13
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11400 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11400 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPCRL No.2137 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
There is no representation for the petitioners.
2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. for the State.
3. Mr. Mohd. Azim, Advocate for respondent no.3.
4. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions, submits that after investigation charge sheet has been submitted on 12.12.2021 against the petitioners.
5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State, the writ petition has rendered infructuous, however it is open to the petitioners to challenge the charge sheet before appropriate forum.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
13.05.2025 SK