A.S.No.569 of 2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR A.S.No.569 of 2005 E.Chellammal (Died) 2.Samarasam 3.Mani Megalai 4.Panneerselvam ... Appellants (Appellants 2 to 4 brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant viz., (E.Chellammal) vide Court order dated 28.04.2022 made in CMP.No.6649 of 2022 in A.S.No.569 of 2005) vs. 1.E.Arunachalam (Died) 2.Lilli Bai (Died) 3.M.Baskran 4.Adilakshmi (Died) 5.Renuka 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S.No.569 of 2005 6.Sridhar 7.Jayanthi 8.Chitra (Respondents 5 to 8 brought on record as LRs of the deceased 2nd Respondent viz., (Lilli Bai) vide Court order dated 28.04.2022 made in CMP.No.6644 of 2022 in A.S.No.569 of 2005) 9.Kumar 10.A.Thiyagu 11.Mala alias Bhuvaneswari 12.Sarala ... Respondents (R1 and R4 died. R9 to R12 are brought on record as LR's of the deceased R1 and R4 vide Court order dated 17.07.2025 in A.S.No.569 of 2005) PRAYER: First Appeal is filed under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment and decree of the Trial Court dated 26.02.2004 in O.S.No.14077 of 1996 passed by the I Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. For Appellants : No Appearance 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S.No.569 of 2005 J U D G M E N T When the first appeal was taken up for hearing on 02.09.2025, there was no representation for the appellants. Therefore, in order to give an opportunity to the appellants, the Registry was directed to list the matter today (i.e., 03.09.2025) under the caption 'For Dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the appellants. Hence, the First Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. 03.09.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No dm To The I Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S.No.569 of 2005 S.SOUNTHAR, J. dm A.S.No.569 of 2005 03.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis