SHYAM MANOHAR KESARWANI v. VISHWANATH KESARWANI and 5 ORS.
WRIA/1000033/2003 · 2025-04-29
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 113938 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 113938 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24560 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1000033 of 2003 Petitioner :- Shyam Manohar Kesarwani Respondent :- Vishwanath Kesarwani And 5 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Karan Agrawal,Dharmendra Kumar Bhatt,Yogesh Kesarwani Counsel for Respondent :- K.C. Gupta,N.K. Srivastava,Nand Kumar Srivastava,P.K. Tripathi,Pankaj Kumar,Piyush Chandra Agarwal,Saghar Mehdi,Tung Nath Tiwari Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
2. The counsel for the petitioner argues that the present petition has been filed against an order whereby the impleadment application was rejected.
3. Considering the reasonings recorded in the two orders and the same being interlocutory in nature, I do not see any reason to interfere. The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 29.4.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench