RAJU KUSHWAHA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME and ANR.
A482/8693/2017 · 2025-05-09
Mohd Azhar Husain Idrisi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 113928 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 113928 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27218 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8693 of 2017 Applicant :- Raju Kushwaha Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Sarvesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi,J.
1. Despite revised call, no one appears either for applicant or opposite party no.2. However, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
2. From perusal of record, it transpires that the matter was referred for mediation by order of this Court dated 22.12.2017, but there is no report of mediation centre about fate of the mediation.
3. Supplementary affidavit bearing CMA No.127056 of 2019 is on record, wherein in para-2 it is stated that compromise has taken place in between petitioner and opposite party no.2 and matter has been settled outside the Court. Copy of the compromise is part of the supplementary affidavit.
4. None of the parties has put in their appearance. They are not responding even today, despite repeated calls, therefore, the present application is dismissed in default.
5. Interim order, if any stands vacated. Order Date :- 9.5.2025 MN/- Digitally signed by :- MAHENDRA NATH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench