Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11392 (UTT)

SUKHDEV SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1024/2024 · 2025-03-26

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:2205 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1024 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Balvinder Singh, learned counsel for petitioner. 2. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Vipul Painuli and Ms. Sweta Dobhal, learned Brief Holders for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent Nos.1 & 2. 3. Mr. Hemant Singh Dangwal, learned counsel for respondent No.3. 4. Delay in filing the counter affidavit is condoned. Counter affidavit filed by the State is taken on record. Delay condonation application (IA/3/2024) made therefor, is allowed. 5. By means of the present criminal writ petition, petitioner has challenged the FIR No.159 of 2024 dated 29.08.2024 registered with P.S. Nanakmatta, District Udham Singh Nagar, under Sections 106(1) and 281 of B.N.S. Act, 2023, on the ground of a compromise intend to between the petitioner and respondent No.3. 6. Since, in this episode, the minor son of respondent No.3 was killed in a bus accident. The said bus No.UK 6 PA 0728 was driven by the petitioner. 7. In the opinion of this Court, since the minor son of respondent No.3 has lost his life, therefore, respondent No.3 has no right to compound the matter with the petitioner. 8. Accordingly, the compounding application (IA/1/2024) is rejected. 9. In view of the above, the criminal writ petition is dismissed. 10. Interim order dated 06.12.2024 stands vacated. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 26.03.2025 PN