HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 23475 of 2012 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Sri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel is present for the State. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioner feels that the matter survives, liberty is granted to her to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. September 24, 2025 Kirti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : R.K. Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhinav Krishna, Abhinava Krishna Srivastava, P.K. Singh, Vrindavan Mishra (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Aamna Begum .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad