Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:10889
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1594 of 2025 1 - Dwarika Prasad Sahu S/o Shri P.L. Sahu Aged About 50 Years Presently Posted As Non- Medical Assistant At Community Health Centre Keshkal Police Station-Kondagaon, District- Kondagaon Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Public Health And Family Welfare Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Commissioner Of Health Service Directorate Department Of Health Services Indrawati Bhawan
New
Raipur
District
Raipur
(C.G) 3 - Director Health Service Directorate Of Health Services Indrawati Bhawan New Raipur, District-
Raipur,
Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Medical And Health Officer Kondagaon District- Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Shri Sanjeev Kumar Sahu, Advocate For State/Respondents : Shri Rishabh Bisen, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board 05/03/2025
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in earlier round of litigation the petitioner filed a petition being WPS No.2665 of 2015 along with other petitioners in which this Court vide order dated 15.4.2024 directed the Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.03.17 18:34:27 +0530
2 respondents authorities to consider the case of the petitioners for grant of revised pay scale. According to the petitioner, the revised pay scale has been granted to the similarly situated employees from 1.4.2006. This Court vide
order dated 15.4.2024 had directed the respondents authorities to consider the representation of the petitioner and to decide the same in accordance with law. Accordingly, the petitioner filed representation in compliance of the order passed by this Court. Thereafter, several representations have been filed by the petitioner and the last one was filed on 10.2.2025. However, it is still pending for consideration. Therefore, the petitioner at the outset submits that the respondents authorities may be directed to consider his representation and decide the same in accordance with law.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents submits that he has no objection if the above direction is issued to the State/respondents.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the respondents authorities are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order as the representations have been filed way back from 17.12.2024 to 10.2.2025.
4. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
JUDGE Gopal Singh