IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 290 of 2025 Date of Decision : 02.06.2025 Kuldeep Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate. For respondents No.1 to 4/State : Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate General. For respondents No.5 to 27 : None. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take all pleas, which have been taken by him in the instant proceedings before the learned Trial Court. 2. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take all the pleas which have been taken by him in the instant proceedings before 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 the learned Trial Court. The learned Trial Court shall decide the matter without being influenced by the pendency/disposal of the petition before this Court. 3. The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 2nd June, 2026 (Chander)