Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11387 (UTT)

SUBHASH CHANDRA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/796/2023 · 2025-02-11

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS ABA No.796 of 2023 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.S. Rawat, A.G.A. for the State. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant has already been exonerated and the anticipatory bail application has rendered infructuous. This is what has been confirmed by the learned State Counsel. The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 11.02.2025 RV