Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11386 (AP)

B VENKATA SUBBAIAH v. THE STATE OF AP

WA/227/2025 · 2025-03-17

Ninala Jayasurya, Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV^ MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ c PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO^ WRIT APPEAL NO: 227 OF Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 07.03.2025 in WP 5447 of 2025 on the file of the High Court. _ Between: B Venkata Subbaiah, S/o Lakshmi Narayana Aged About 50 Sr523"‘'70 """"" Kondepi M Pedakandlagunta I '■ I If; cl to Ui ry years ...APPELLANT(S) _ AND 1. The State of AP, Rep by its Principar Secretary School Education Department Secretariat Velagapudi Amaravathi Guntur District 2. The Commissioner of School Education Venkatadri Towers Mangalagiri 3. The District Collector, Prakasam, Prakasam District 4. The Regional Joint Director of School Department Guntur 5. The District Education Officer, Prakasam Prakasam 6. The Deputy Educational Officer, School Prakasam 7. The Mandal Educational Officer, Kondepi Prakasam School Education Department Education, School Education District Education Department Ongole District 9. T Venkateswarlu, S/o Sambaiah aged 52 years Occ: Cultivation and Business PedakandlaguntaV Kondepi Mandal Prakasam District — (Respondent No 9 impjeaded as per Court Order dated 07.03.2025 vide I A No 2 of 2025) ...RESPONDENTS lA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner/ appellant irUo service in suspending the order of the DEO Prakasam vide Rc.No.1916/B5/2024 dated 01.03.2025 in respect of appellants suspension from service. Counsel for the Appellants: SRI GUNDALA SIVA PRASADA REDDY,^ Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 7: GP FOR SERVICES II ^ Counsel for the Respondent No.8: SRI M SUDHIR (SC FOR ZPPS, MPPS &GP) Counsel for the Respondent No.9: SRI SRINIVASULU KURRA -- The Court made the following: JUDGMENT APHC010131902025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT APPEAL NO: 227/2025 Between; B Venkata Subbaiah S/o. Lakshmi Narayana AND ...Appellant The State of Andhra Pradesh, and 8 others Counsel for the Appellant: Mr. Gundala Siva Prasad Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: 1. OP for Services-ll 2. Mr. Srinivasulu Kurra 3. Mr. Sudhir Mattegunta The Court made the fjoHowing Judgment: (per NJS,J) The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the appeal, with a liberty to flid'afresh, if it is so advised. Permission is accorded. ...Respondents ■-i*' This Writ Appeafis dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs. Miscelianeous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed. 2. Sd/- Wl.RAMESH BABU deputy registry //TRUE COPY// ^N OFFICER SE' To, One CC to Sri Gundala Siva Prasada Reddy Advocate [OPUCJ- One CC to Sri Srinivasula Kurra Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Sri M Sudhir (SC for ZPPS, MPPS & GP)Advocate' [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Services II, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Three CD Copies 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. TF HIGH COURT DATED:17/03/2025 ORDER WA.No.227 of 2025 * 2 V MAK 2025 S a Co ^ . Current beciion . ^fc£^SPATCVA«^.^^ WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS