Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 113815 (ALL)

AJEET KUMAR MAURYA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OR.

A482/9/2025 · 2025-01-06

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:678 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9 of 2025 Applicant :- Ajeet Kumar Maurya And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Or. Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Maurya,Kanchan,Pawan Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioners as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. The present petition has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of case no. 134/2021 titled as "Santosh Kumari Vs. Chandra Prakash Etc.", under Sections 323/504/506/354 IPC and Section 9(g)/10 of POCSO Act, P.S. Hardi, District Bahraich pending in the Court of learned ADJ/Special Judge (POCSO Act), Bahraich as well as the summoning order dated 20.07.2024. Learned counsel for petitioners, after arguing for some time, submits that present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021" to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the petitioners Ajeet Kumar Maurya and Sandeep Kumar Maurya appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and apply for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra). Order Date :- 6.1.2025/R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench