Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 113802 (PNJ)

RAJ PAL v. ANAND MOHAN SHARAN IAS AND ORS

COCP/4266/2024 · 2025-02-18

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

136/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA RAJ PAL ANAND MOHAN SHARAN IAS AND CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Deepak Sonak, Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA Learned State counsel representing informs that the order passed by the Writ Court has been Intra-Court Appeal bearing In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage, however, wit revival of the present petition, subject to final outcome of the LPA. Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Rule stands discharged. 18.02.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: Versus MOHAN SHARAN IAS AND ORS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Deepak Sonak, Advocate for the Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel representing informs that the order passed by the Writ Court has been Court Appeal bearing LPA No.487 of 2025. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage, however, wit revival of the present petition, subject to final outcome of the LPA. Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Rule stands discharged. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-4266-2024 Date of Decision: February 18, 2025 ........Petitioner ORS .....Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manish Dadwal, AAG, Haryana. Learned State counsel representing the respondents informs that the order passed by the Writ Court has been stayed in an 2025. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition at this stage, however, with liberty to seek revival of the present petition, subject to final outcome of the LPA. Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE asoned Yes/No Yes/No 2024 February 18, 2025 the respondents stayed in an In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner does h liberty to seek TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.02.19 13:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document