SHRIGONDA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR v. DADASAHEB BABASAHEB BARGUJE
WP/3843/2025 · 2025-09-16
Shri Arun R Pedneker
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11380 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11380 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 3843.25WP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 997 WRIT PETITION NO.3843 OF 2025 SHRIGONDA SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR VERSUS DADASAHEB BABASAHEB BARGUJE ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr.A.V.Hon Advocate for Respondent : Mr.P.V.Barde …
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
DATE : 16.09.2025 P.C. : 1] The parties submit that the writ petition can be
disposed of in terms of settlement. 2] The learned counsel for the respondent submits that in terms of settlement, certain amounts are required to be paid by the petitioner to the respondent as per schedule given in the settlement deed. He further submits that the petitioner be directed to deposit the amount before the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar and the respondent be permitted to withdraw the said amount from the Industrial Court. 2025:BHC-AUG:25156
2 3843.25WP 3] The petitioner agrees to do so in terms of the compromise and the respondent is permitted to withdraw the amount in terms of settlement. 4] In view of the above, the Writ Petition is
disposed of in terms of settlement.
[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC