RAM BACHAN VERMA v. STATE OF U.P.THROUGH SECY.APPOINTMENT
WRIA/2001186/2001 · 2025-04-09
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 113751 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 113751 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20148
Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2001186 of 2001 Petitioner :- Ram Bachan Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P.Through Secy.Appointment Counsel for Petitioner :- R.N.Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
1. Case called out in revised list.
2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition. However, learned Standing Counsel is present.
3. The matter pertains to the year 2001 and since then it has remained pending. It appears that petitioner has lost his interest to pursue his case.
4. After going through the prayer made in the writ petition, it appears that writ petition has become infructuous. Apart from it, there is no interim order operating in favour of the petitioner.
5. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) Order Date :- 9.4.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench