Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11375 (AP)

Gudala Lakshrnana Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/7943/2020 · 2025-02-24

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010132452020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Gudala Lakshrnana Rao, and Others The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioners: Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. Recording the said submission, infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 7943/2020 Gudala Lakshrnana Rao, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioners: B Chandra Shekhar Counsel for the Respondents: Addl. Advocate General (AP) the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. ng the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3458] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) Addl. Advocate General (AP) submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary in the present Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition becomes infructuous. Writ Petition is dismissed as As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand ______________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA BSK 04 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 7943/2020 Date: 24.02.2025 BSK