Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11374 (CHH)

HIRAMANI VERMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1589/2022 · 2025-08-18

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1589 of 2022  Hiramani Verma S/o Babulal Verma Aged About 64 Years Retired Upper Division Teacher, Govt. Middle School Tolipali Block Malkharoda Education District Sakti, Presently R/o Village Bokrel Post Sapiya District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Department Of School Education Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar New Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. The District Education Officer, Education District Sakti, District Jangir Champa Chhattisgarh. 3. The Accountant General Chhattisgarh, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4. The Block Education Officer, Block Malkharoda, Education District Sakti District Janjgir Champa Champa Chhattisgarh. 5. The Joint Director, Accounts Treasury And Pension, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Anil Mourya, Advocate For State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Dy. G.A. For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Ashwani Shukla, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order On Board 19-08-2025 Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.08.20 10:19:58 +0530 2 1) By way of this petition, petitioner has sought following relief :- 10.1 That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to pay 18% interest in GPF amount. 10.2 Any other relief, which the Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances, may also be provided to the petitioner. 2) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner who was working on the post of Upper Division Teacher in Govt. Middle School – Tolipali, Block – Malkharoda, District – Sakti (C.G.) stood retired from service on 30.06.2020. He further submits that petitioner was entitled to receive the amount of GPF immediately after retirement but same was paid to him by the respondent authorities belatedly on 30.09.2021, therefore petitioner is praying for a direction to respondent authorities to make payment of interest on the GPF amount @ 18% from the date it became due till the date of actual payment. 3) On the other hand, Mr. Ashwani Shukla, counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 3 i.e. O/o Accountant General, State of Chhattisgarh submits that proposal was sent by the department on 27.06.2021 i.e. after more that one year and immediately thereafter, authorization letter was issued by respondent No. 3. He further submits that delay in belated payment is attributable to the State authorities. 4) Learned State counsel submits that immediately after receiving the authorization letter from respondent No. 3 on 27.07.2021, 3 claim of petitioner was processed and amount of GPF was paid. She further submits that there was no delay on the part of State authorities. 5) Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 6) Evidently, petitioner stood superannuated on 30.06.2020. The amount of GPF released by O/o Accountant General, State of Chhattisgarh included interest part up to month of December, 2020 whereas actual payment was made to petitioner on 30.09.2021 and for a period of nine months, petitioner has not been paid interest on the GPF amount. 7) Admittedly, necessary documents including recommendation/ authorization were forwarded by the concerned State authority to O/o Accountant General, State of Chhattisgarh on 27.06.2021, therefore, it can safely be presumed that there was delay on the part of State authorities/ department and State authorities are liable to make payment of interest amount to petitioner. 8) In view of the above, State authorities are directed to make payment of interest @ 10% on the amount of GPF amount from the month of January, 2021 till the date of actual payment. 9) With the aforesaid direction(s), this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya