Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11372 (BOM)

UTTAMRAO MALHARI SALVE and ANR v. THE STATE OF MAH

APEAL/285/2006 · 2025-10-03

Shri Sushil M Ghodeswar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 285 OF 2006 UTTAMRAO MALHARI SALVE AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Mr.N.P.Chandiwal, Advocate for the appellant No.1. (Appointed) Mr.D.B.Bhange, APP for the respondent/State. ( CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ) DATE : 3 OCTOBER, 2025 PER COURT : 1. The learned APP states that in pursuance to the order dated 18.09.2025, the statement of the son of appellant No.1 namely Rahul Uttamrao Salve is recorded stating that the name of deceased Uttamrao is mentioned in village record as Uttamrao Kaduba Salve and while in service with Police Department, the name of appellant No.1 is mentioned as Uttamrao Malhari Salve and therefore the certificate, which is supplied earlier as regards appellant No.1, belongs to the same appellant. 2. The death certificate of appellant No.2 is taken on record khs/Oct.2025/285 2025:BHC-AUG:27522 - 2 - and marked as ‘X’ for identification. 3. As both the appellants are died, this appeal is, therefore, disposed of, as abated. 4. The learned Advocate Mr.Chandiwal N.P. is appointed to appear on behalf of appellant No.1 . His fees be quantified and paid as per the Rules of the High Court Legal Aid Sub Committee, Aurangabad. ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) khs/Oct.2025/285