Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 113701 (MAD)

C.P.Panneer v. The Inspector General of Registration

WP/29712/2018 · 2025-03-03

R N Manjula

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 29712 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-03-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA WP No. 29712 of 2018 1. C.P.Panneer S/o. Palanisamy Gounder, Thiruvayalur Village, Puliyampatti Post, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Krishnagiri Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector General of Registration No.100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Chennai - 600 024. 2.The Sub Registrar, North Zone, Kuralagam, Parrys, Chennai - 600 001. 3.Emayavarman, S/o. Seralathan, No.16/7, Subramaniyam Street, Dharmapuri District. Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 29712 of 2018 PRAYER: Writ petition is filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of mandamus to direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 08.09.2018 by directing the 1st respondent to initiate the departmental action against the 2nd respondent for his negligence and abetment by invoking provision under Registration Act. For Petitioner(s): M/s.R.Thulasi For Respondent: Mr.R.Sasikumar Government Advocate for R1 and R2 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated 08.09.2018 by directing the 1st respondent to initiate the departmental action against the 2nd respondent for his negligence and abetment. 2. Despite the petitioner has sent a representation stating that criminal proceedings has to be initiated against the second respondent along with disciplinary action, no action has been initiated by the first respondent so far. The first respondent can consider the representation of the petitioner by passing orders but so far as the recording of the criminal case is concerned, even the petitioner can set the law in motion if he feels that the third respondent has committed some criminal offence during his course of employement. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 29712 of 2018 3. In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed and the first respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner and take an action and communicate to the petitioner as to the outcome of the action initiated by him, at the earliest. No costs. 03-03-2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No bkn To 1.The Inspector General of Registration No.100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Chennai - 600 024. 2.The Sub Registrar, North Zone, Kuralagam, Parrys, Chennai - 600 001. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 29712 of 2018 R.N.MANJULA J. bkn WP No. 29712 of 2018 03-03-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis