Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11370 (AP)

KATASAANI LAKSHMI REDDY ALIAS JADLA LAKSHMI REDDY ALIAS PENUMADA LAKSHMI REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/3726/2025 · 2025-09-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010131382025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3726/2025 Between: 1. KATASAANI LAKSHMI REDDY ALIAS JADLA LAKSHMI REDDY ALIAS PENUMADA LAKSHMI REDDY, S/OPENUMADAOBIREDDY AGE 33 YEARS OLD, R/OBONDIMADUGULAVILLAGE, TUGGALIMANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. (A5) 2. KATASAANI RAVI REDDY ALIAS JADLARAVIKUMAR REDDY),, S/OJADLAVEERA REDDY, AGE 31 YEARS OLD, R/O. BONDIMADUGULA VILLAGE,TUGGALIMANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. (A6) 3. GIRIDHAR MEKALAGIRISH KUMAR, ,S/OSRINIVASULU, AGE 23 YEARS OLD, R/OSHOP CAMP, KALLURMANDAL, KURNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. (A8) 4. CHALLABANDANAGIREDDY, , S/O. SHESHI REDDY, AGE 38 YEARS OLD,R/O. REMADURU VILLAGE, KALLURMANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.(A9) 5. REMADURU SHANKAR, (@SHANKAR), S/OLAXMANNA, AGE 23 YEARS OLD,R/O. REMADURU VILLAGE, KALLURMANDAL,KURNOOL DISTRICT. (A10) 6. MADASUNAGARAJU,, S/O NAGANNA, AGE 42 YEARS OLD,R/O. HOUSING BOARD COLONY, KURNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT 2 AMARAVATI. 2. N CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O. LATE N.VENKATASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 45 YRS,R/O. PLOT NO. 122, CENTRAL PLAZA, KURNOOL TOWN,KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. VEERAVALLI VENKATA RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. RACHURI LAKSHMIKAR 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant petition under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.5, 6, 8 to 11 seeking quashment of proceedings against them in SC/ST No.53 of 2022, on the file of the Special Court for SC/ST Act cases cum VI Additional District Judge, Kurnool. 2. Heard Sri V.V.Ravi Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of dispensing the presence of the Petitioners before the trial Court on every adjournment. 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Petition is disposed of, dispensing with the presence of the Petitioners/Accused Nos.5, 6, 8 to 11 before the trial Court, unless their presence is specifically directed by the trial Court. However, the Petitioners are at liberty to raise all the contentions before the trial Court in their defence. The learned trial Judge may appreciate the same and take an appropriate decision in accordance with law. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stands closed. Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA,J Date: 02.09.2025 MH 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 34 Crl.P.No.3726 of 2025 Dt.02.09.2025 MH