Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 113677 (ALL)

ANGAD YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/43678/2024 · 2025-05-21

S Q H Rizvi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:87460 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 43678 of 2024 Petitioner :- Angad Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anchal,Baijant Kumar Mishra,Pramod Kumar Varma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J. Shri Mayank Tiwari holding brief of Shri B.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Awadhesh Kumar Patel, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Shri Sudhir Bharti,learned counsel for Gaon Sabha-respondent No. 4 are present. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Tehsildar, Tehsil Kasya, district Kushinagar-respondent No. 3 to expeditiously decide the proceedings under Section 67 of the U.p. Revenue Code, 2006 in Case No. 1644 of 2023 (Gaon Sabha vs. Harilal). Learned counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents has raised objection regarding the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground of locus of the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner is not a party to the aforesaid proceedings pending before the Tehsildar, and as such he has no right to seek any relief in respect of the proceedings pending in between the Gaon Sabha and the private-respondents. In view of aforesaid, the present writ petition is not entertainable and is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 22.5.2025 Sumaira Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad