1 2025:CGHC:11986 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 1740 of 2025 Puluram Kumhar S/o Late Shri Jodhan Ram Kumhar Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Rupdega Thana Lailunga District - Raigarh (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Police Station Lailunga District - Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent For Applicant : Mr.Aniruddha Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent/State :Mr. Keshav Dewangan, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 11.03.2025 1. The applicant has preferred this Second bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of bail as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 339/2023, registered at Police Station-Lailunga, District Raigarh (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code. 2. Brief facts of this case is that on17.10.2023 complainant Nandlal Kumhar has given the merg intimation with the averment that he received the information over phone call that his sister has died 2 so he went to her house and saw her dead and upon enquiry came to know that the applicant has beaten her due to which she has died so on the basis of the said report the thana police registered the offence and arrested the applicant for the alleged commission of offence and after completing the investigation filed the chargesheet. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that, the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the alleged crime, he has not committed any offence as alleged against him. He contended that there is no eye witness of the incident and only on the basis of doubt the applicant has been implicated. The prosecution agency has not collected any direct or indirect evidence against the applicant, he is in jail since 18.10.2023. Hence he pleads to grant bail to the applicant in the interest of justice. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application submitted by the applicant. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the case and other materials available on record. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and further considering the nature of offence, and the evidence available on record it is crystal clear that the applicant 3 is involved in the crime and there are clinching chain of evidences which proves the same. This court finds that there are no substantial ground of circumstantial changes . Therefore, this court is of the considered opinion that this case is not a fit case to allow the bail application of the applicant. 7. Accordingly, the instant miscellaneous criminal appeal stands dismissed. However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial as soon as possible, if no legal impediment. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information and compliance forthwith. sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge alfiza