Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 113668 (ALL)

SATISH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLRD/2167/2024 · 2025-02-07

Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 48 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 2167 of 2024 Revisionist :- Satish Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Sandeep Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. None appears on behalf of the revisionists even in revised call. 2. Shri Jyoti Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State respondent is present. 3. The instant revision has been filed with delay of 238 days challenging the order dated 22.01.2024 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No.2, Varanasi in Maintenance Petition No.528 of 2019 (Smt. Savitri Pandey v. Satish Pandey) awarding interim maintenance of Rs.6000/- per month to opposite party no.2. 4. No sufficient cause has been shown for the delay in filing the revision. 5. Accordingly, the revision is dismissed on the ground of delay. Order Date :- 7.2.2025 S.P. Digitally signed by :- SANJAY PURI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad