Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:18111 Court No. - 82 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 2545 of 2024 Applicant :- Mamta Gupta Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ken Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 1, Agra to decide the Complaint Case No. 9024 of 2021 (Smt. Mamta Gupta Vs. Prateek Gupta and others) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., Police Station Jagdishpura, District Agra, expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the complainant in this case and the matter is pending since the year 2021 at the stage of summoning of the accused- opposite party nos. 2 and 3. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. It appears from perusal of the record that the applicant before this Court is the complainant in this matter. Evidence on the point of summoning of the accused has been adduced by the applicant. A perusal of the order sheet reveals that some incriminating material was sent to the handwriting expert but subsequently the report of the handwriting expert was also filed and now the case is pending for further proceedings. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned trial court is directed to make all the endeavours to pass the order on the point of summoning within two months from today and further to decide the Complaint Case No. 9024 of 2021 (Smt. Mamta Gupta Vs. Prateek Gupta and others) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., Police Station Jagdishpura, District Agra expeditiously, preferably within a period of two years from the date of production of certified copy of this order without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is also made clear that the Court/Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and execution authorities, advocates, parties to the case, staff are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Rmk. Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad