Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35784 Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 47585 of 2024 Applicant :- Bablu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application, under Section 483 B.N.S.S., has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 188 of 2024, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 333, 109(1) B.N.S., Police Station- Jansath, District- Muzaffarnagar during pendency of the trial. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case. As per the allegations in the first information report six named accused including the applicant and one unknown person are alleged to have caused firearm injury to the husband of the informant Rishipal and one Pintu. As per the medical report of two injured, they received single injury on their thigh region. In the statement of the two injured the co-accused Aryan and Rishi are alleged to have caused the said injuries. It is next contended that the co-accused Golu has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 11.12.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 43452 of 2024. The applicant does not have any criminal history. The applicant is in jail since 4.9.2024. In case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having heard counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this Court prima facie finds that as per the allegations in the first information report six named accused including the applicant and one unknown person are alleged to have caused firearm injury to the husband of the informant Rishipal and one Pintu. As per the medical report of two injured, they received single injury on their thigh region. In the statement of the two injured the co-accused Aryan and Rishi are alleged to have caused the said injuries. The co-accused Golu has been granted bail by this Court. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. At this stage there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence. Further the applicant has presently remained confined for more than six months and there is no hope of early conclusion of trial, more so when no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicant, if enlarged on bail, would either tamper with the evidence or intimidate the witness, without commenting on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant, Bablu involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned on the following conditions that: i. the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; ii. the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witness; iii. the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 S.S. Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad