[2025:RJ-JP:11698] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3765/2025 1. Basant @ Sonu S/o Siyaram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Mahukalan, Police Station Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. 2. Jitu @ Jitendra S/o Madanlal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Mahukalan, Police Station Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. 3. Rajesh Kumar S/o Satyanarayan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Piplai, Police Station Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined At Jail Gangapurcity) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Its PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Balram Vashisth, Mr. Devendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.220/2023 registered at Police Station Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 323, 452 and 307 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submit that petitioners are not named in the FIR and co-accused persons of this case have already been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate bench of this Court. There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioners are in custody since [2025:RJ-JP:11698] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3765/2025] 27.02.2025 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially considering the fact that petitioners are not named in the FIR and similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate bench of this Court, so also considering the fact that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – (1) Basant @ Sonu S/o Siyaram, (2) Jitu @ Jitendra S/o Madanlal and (3) Rajesh Kumar S/o Satyanarayan, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J pcg/978