Vatturi Chandra Santhi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/7887/2020 · 2025-02-19
Kiranmayee Mandava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11362 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11362 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010131832020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] WEDNESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 7887/2020 Between: Vatturi Chandra Santhi, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMESH BABU TALLURI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following Order:
Challenging the action of the respondents (more particularly, third respondent), in trying to interfere with the petitioner’s agricultural land in an extent of Ac.0.78 cents in Sy.No.588/3 of kajuluru village and Mandal, the instant writ petition is filed.
2. Heard M/s.Ramesh Babu Talluri, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3.
2
3. It is contended that the subject land is a patta land of the petitioner, for installing a statue in the said premises and for allotting the same as house sites, the respondents are trying to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over subject land.
4. On behalf of respondents, Counter affidavit has been filed. Though the respondents do not dispute the title of the petitioner, however, it is contended that the petitioner has encroached to an extent of Ac.0.03 cents adjacent to the subject land and it is further stated that the respondents would take appropriate action under the provisions of A.P.Land Encroachment Act for eviction of the petitioner.
5. Having regard to the same, the respondents are directed not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner’s land, however, granting liberty to the respondents to proceed in accordance with law, if the possession of the petitioner is found to be unauthorised. If the respondents contemplate any action against the petitioner, the same shall be in accordance with law. The respondents shall provide sufficient opportunity to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
Date: 19.02.2025 sj
3
397 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 7887/2020
Date: 19.02.2025 sj