188-2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 998 CONT. PETITION NO. 188 OF 2018 IN WP/8024/2017 Rahul Sandu Ankushe And Others VERSUS Sunil Vinodrai Raithatha And Another … • Mr. Anagha Pandit, Advocate for the Petitioners • Mrs. U. S. Bhosale, AGP for Respondent/s – State • Adv. D. A. Karnik h/f. Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 … WITH CONT. PETITION NO. 192 OF 2018 IN WP/8027/2017 … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SMT. VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 25, 2025 P E R C O U R T : 1. Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the contempt petition is filed alleging contempt of the interim order. The main writ petition itself is dismissed. Therefore, its contempt petition is rendered infructuous. 2. Contempt Petition is disposed of as infructuous. [SMT. VAISHALI PATIL – JADHAV, J.] [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] komal kamble 1/1 2025:BHC-AUG:26897-DB