Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11360 (KAR)

TULASABAI W/O LATE MARUTI v. MANDIP SINGH THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL IHQ AND ORS

CCC/200179/2022 · 2025-04-16

K Natarajan, Vijaykumar A Patil

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2326-DB CCC No. 200179 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K NATARAJAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.200179 OF 2022 () BETWEEN: TULASABAI W/O LATE MARUTI, AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O: 18-3-323 MAILOOR ROAD, HANUMAN TEMPLE WADDER COLONY, TQ. AND DIST. BIDAR-585401. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. JAIRAJ K. BUKKA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. MANDIP SINGH THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL IHQ OF MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (ARMY) 434A, A WING, SENA BHAWAN, DHQ PO, NEW DELHI-110011. 2. MALLIKARJUN PATIL REDDY THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DEPT. OF SAINIK WELFARE AND RESETTLEMENT MINI VIDHAN SOUDA KALABURAGI-585101 Digitally signed by NIJAMUDDIN JAMKHANDI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2326-DB CCC No. 200179 of 2022 3. MAJINDER SINGH THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, MADRAS REGIMENT RECORDS C/O 56 APO WELLINTON NILGIRIS TAMIL NADU-900458 …ACCUSED 4. THE DEFENSE SECRETARY, UNION OF INDIA, 101-A, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110011 …PROFARMA PARTY THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS OF CONTEMPT AGAINST THE ACCUSED / RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 FOR THEIR WILLFUL, DELIBERATE, WANTON DISOBEDIENCE, OF ORDER THIS HON’BLE COURT DATED 18-01-2022 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO.201292/2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-A TO THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:2326-DB CCC No. 200179 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K NATARAJAN AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) On 18.02.2025 a week’s time was granted to do the needful. On 22.03.2025, the learned counsel for the petitioner/complainant was absent. Finally a week’s time was granted to take steps for issuance of notice to respondent No.2, failing which, the petition will be dismissed for default. Again today matter is called out, there is no representation for the petitioner/complainant. It appears that the petitioner is not interest in prosecuting the case. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (K NATARAJAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE KJJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4 CT:SI