IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 129 CWP-5509-2025 Date of decision: 11.03.2025 BALWINDER SINGH SAINI ….PETITIONER Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Tushaar Madaan, Advocate for Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J (ORAL) 1. On 27.02.2025, the following order was passed: “The petitioner was suspended vide order dated 16.03.2017 and he remained under suspension till December’ 2018. Learned State counsel seeks accommodation to ascertain as to how ACR for the period from April’ 2017 to February’ 2018 was recorded when no ACR was recorded for the period from 01.04.2018 to July’ 2018 on the ground that ‘officer is under suspension’. Adjourned to 11.03.2025.” 2. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab submits that claim of petitioner is under active consideration of the Competent Authority i.e. Commissioner of Police, Ludhiana (respondent No. 4) who would pass an appropriate order within 3 months from today. 3. Counsel for petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangement. MANOJ KUMAR 2025.03.12 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-5509-2025 -2- 4. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 4 to pass an appropriate order within 3 months from today. 11.03.2025 [JAGMOHAN BANSAL] manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2025.03.12 10:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document