IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 116 KEWAL RAM BADHAN STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Ms. Anmol Thakur Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab MANISHA BATRA 1. The petitioner is seeking directions to respondents No.2 take appropriate legal action against resp officials of State Bank of India, Industrial Area Branch, Jalandhar for making illegal and unlawful withdrawals from the saving bank account as well as pension account of 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prayer and submits 19.10.2024 before the raising his grievances as yet been considered and no action has that at this stage, the issued to respondent No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision :04.03.2025 KEWAL RAM BADHAN Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Ms. Anmol Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The petitioner is seeking directions to respondents No.2 take appropriate legal action against respondent No.4 and other guilty ban officials of State Bank of India, Industrial Area Branch, Jalandhar for making illegal and unlawful withdrawals from the saving bank account as well as pension account of the petitioner without his knowledge and consent. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prayer and submits that the petitioner has filed a representation before the Commissioner of Police, grievances as mentioned in the present yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied if appropriate directio respondent No. 2- Commissioner of Police, IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.12037 of 2025 Date of decision :04.03.2025 …. Petitioner …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA the petitioner. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab. The petitioner is seeking directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to ondent No.4 and other guilty bank officials of State Bank of India, Industrial Area Branch, Jalandhar for making illegal and unlawful withdrawals from the saving bank account as well as the petitioner without his knowledge and consent. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner restricts his filed a representation/complaint on of Police, Jalandhar (Annexure P-1) in the present petition but the same has not been taken thereon. He further submitted satisfied if appropriate directions are of Police, Jalandhar to decide the and 3 to k officials of State Bank of India, Industrial Area Branch, Jalandhar for making illegal and unlawful withdrawals from the saving bank account as well as restricts his on ) petition but the same has not further submitted ns are decide the Jyoti 2025.03.04 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take thereon. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to h 5. In view of the limited p commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of one month 04.03.2025 Jyoti-IV CRM-M No.12037 of 2025 aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 19.10.2024 (Annexure P one month, by passing a speaking order in (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No M No.12037 of 2025 -2- aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner and take necessary action Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab, who is present in accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the during the course of the day. rayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-1) of the petitioner within a , by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No necessary action who is present in State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the , without disposed the aforesaid tioner within a Jyoti 2025.03.04 18:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document