Sri Ravi Maheshwari v. State Of Uttarakhand AND OTHERS
SPA/928/2017 · 2025-04-28
Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11353 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11353 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SPA No.928/17 Hon’ble Rajiv Sharma, ACJ. Hon’ble Manoj Kr. Tiwari, J. Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Rahul Consul, Advocate, for the respondent no.6. For the reasons stated, application (CLMA 14170/18), seeking condonation of 6 days’ delay in moving the restoration application, is allowed. Delay is condoned. Also heard on the restoration application (MCC 1244/18). The application is allowed. The appeal is restored to its original number. List on its turn.
(Manoj Kr. Tiwari, J.) (Rajiv Sharma, ACJ.)
24.09.2018 Rdang