Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11353 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A483/154/2025 · 2025-01-31

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:14477 Court No. - 82 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 154 of 2025 Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the S.T. No. 1390 of 2024, arising out of case crime no. 0191 of 2024, under Sections 452, 302, 307, 34 IPC, Police Station Civil Lines, District Budaun, pending in the Court of Sessions Judge Budaun expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the informant in the said session trial and same is pending since the year 2024. It is also submitted that Charges have been framed in the matter. It is also submitted that evidence of PW-1 and PW-2 has been recorded and the case is at the stage of recording the evidence of other witnesses. The applicant is being threatened by the associates of the accused. The Court concerned is not taking proper interest in disposal of the said session trial. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. It reveals from the perusal of the order sheets that the said S.T. is pending since the year 2024 and the same is at the stage of recording of the evidence of witnesses. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to make all endeavours for expeditious disposal of the said session trial, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 31.1.2025 safi Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad