[2025:JHHC:13337] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3394 of 2025 Nitesh Kumar Singh @ Nitu Singh aged about 34 years, son of Late Shyamdeo Singh, Resident of Village Barwadih, P.O. - Barwadih, P.S.- Chiniya, District -Garhwa, State Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. R. S. Mazumdar, Sr. Adv. For the State : Mr. Subodh , Addl. PP For the informant : Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Adv. 02 / 02.05.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chiniya P.S. Case No. 07 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 118 (2), 109 and 61 (2) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder Yogendra Prasad. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR and during the course of investigation, it has come that the co-accused Amit Kumar Singh fired upon Yogendra Prasad. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused Bablu Singh. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 14 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 20.03.2025 , as mentioned in para 15 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Garhwa in connection with Chiniya P.S. Case No. 07 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-