RASHMI GOYAL v. EXCISE COMMISSIONER STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPMS/2513/2023 · 2025-10-08
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11349 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11349 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:8865 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/2513/2023 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
4. In view of the statement made by
learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
08.10.2025
Navin
NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f 487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A10381 9DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB21C E5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2025.10.08 18:57:47 +05'30'