ANUSUCHIT JANJATI CHATRAVAS SANVIDA KARAMCHARI SANGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SAW/237/2024 · 2025-07-31
Chandra Prakash Shrimali, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11349 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11349 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:29127-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 237/2024 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12904/2021 Anusuchit Janjati Chatravas Sanvida Karamchari Sangh, (Zila Parishad Jaipur Manda) Having Its Office At Nandlal Meena House, Jairam Ka Bas, Post Anatpura, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) Through Its Secretary Shri Sitaram Meena S/o Shri Dev Narayan Meena, R/o Ward No.8, Bas Bhagwatpura Kotkhawda, District Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment, Government of Rajasthan, Near 22 Godon Bridge, Jaipur.
3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Jaipur.
4. Government Anusuchit Janjati Balika Ashram, Bhagwatsar Kankaria, Tehsil Kotkhawada, District Jaipur Through Its Superintendent. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. B.R. Rana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI
Order 31/07/2025
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant fairly states that the issue raised in the present appeal stands finally adjudicated by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.243/2024 (Anusuchit Janjati Chatravas Sanvida Karamchari Sangh vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 15.05.2024.
[2025:RJ-JP:29127-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-237/2024]
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the appellant further submits that although the order was passed which covers the present appeal, he wants to file a review with respect to the judgment rendered by the Division Bench in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.243/2024.
3. We are of the firm view that as on today, the law as laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in the aforesaid
judgment (supra), shall continue to operate and subsequently, Division Bench would be bound to follow the same, unless it takes a different view.
4. We see no reason to take a different view. At this stage, the present Special Appeal (Writ) is dismissed in the same terms.
5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J AMIT/48