1 2025:HHC:3282 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Civil Revision No. 43 of 2020 Date of Decision: February 24, 2025 Vijay Kumar ….Appellant Versus Ram Kumar Gupta & others ..Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Appellant: Mr.Ashok Sood, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr.Rajat, Advocate, vice Mr.Abhishek Banta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.Praveen Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr.Y.P. Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Vivek Singh Thakur, J (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of present petition, matter has been settled amicably between the parties, with respect to rent, use and occupation charges of the premises and petitioner has handed over the vacant possession to respondent No.1-landlord and now nothing survives to be adjudicated and, therefore, in view of aforesaid settlement, he has instructions not to press the present petition. 2. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1, under instructions, has endorsed the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner-tenant. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:3282 3. In view of above, present petition is disposed of being not pressed in terms of settlement. Pending application(s) also stand disposed of. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. February 24, 2025 (Purohit)