Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 113485 (ALL)

KUSH KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/44772/2024 · 2025-09-10

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 44772 of 2024 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State perused the record. 2. This application has been filed by the applicants to quash the entire proceeding of Case Crime No.108 of 2022 (State vs. Sandip Verma & others) under Sections 66-D Information & Technology Act 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC Police Station Sahtawar, District Ballia including Charge sheet dated 24.06.2023 as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 07.09.2024 passed by Judicial Magistrate 1st, Ballia. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he relinquishes the prayer for quashment and wishes to move bail application before the trial court in view of the guidelines/observations given by Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2021) 10 SCC 773 . 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Considering the above submissions and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that in case the applicant appears before the court concerned within three weeks from today and moves application for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of in terms of the guidelines/observations given by Hon'ble Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil (supra). 6. For a period of three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pradeep Singh Sengar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kush Kumar Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 7. It is made clear that in the event no such application is moved within the time prescribed above, this order will be of no avail to the applicant. 8. With the above direction, the instant application under Section 428 Cr.P.C is finally disposed of. However, it is made clear that none of the grounds are convincing for seeking quashing of entire proceedings. September 11, 2025 Rakesh A482 No. 44772 of 2024 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad