Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11347 (CAL)

SAMIR KUMAR SENGUPTA v. ASHIS MUKHERJEE ALIAS KHOKAN

CO/614/2025 · 2025-02-24

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. 6 (265719) 24.02.2025 (AD 18) (S. Banerjee) CO 614 of 2025 Samir Kumar Sengupta Vs. Ashis Mukherjee Alias Khokan Mr. Kushal Chatterjee Mr. Debrup Choudhury …for the petitioner This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the plaintiff praying for a direction upon the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), 2nd Court at Barrackpore to dispose of Ejectment Suit No. 69 of 2009 expeditiously. From the order-sheets appended to the civil revision application it appears that March 6, 2025 has been fixed for hearing of the application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure and for filing of the Commissioner’s report. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to direct issuance of notice upon the opposite party. However, learned advocate for the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with a copy of this order upon the opposite party or his learned advocates representing him before the learned trial Judge. Learned trial Judge is requested to take up the hearing of the application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC on the next date fixed, i.e., on March 6, 2025 and to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably by the end of May, 2025, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. After disposal of the interlocutory application and filing of the Commissioner’s report, the learned trial Judge is requested to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. With the above observations CO 614 of 2025 stands disposed of. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.) 2