APHC010131042020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7840/2020 Between: 1. KANURI KIRAN KUMAR, S/O.VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED 50 YEARS, HINDU, NURSERY BUSINESS, NANDANAVANAM NURSERY, OPP- FISH RESEARCH CENTRE, PENAMALURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT. MACHILIPATNAM 3. S H O, PENAMALUR P.S. PENAMALUR KRISHNA DISTRICT 4. MOWA BASAVA KUTUMBA RAO, S/O.BASAVA PUNNAYYA, AGED 62 YEARS, HINDU, MALE, RETD., EMPLOYEE OPP- ANDHRA BANK, PENAMALUR, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. MOWA BASAVA KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. BASAVA PUNNAYYA, HINDU, MALE, AGED 60 YEARS, BUSINESS, APP- ANDHRA BANK, PENAMALUR, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. MOWA VARMA, S/O..BASAVA PUNNAYYA, HINDU, MALE, AGED 57 YEARS, BUSINESS, APP- ANDHRA BANK, PENAMALUR, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not giving protection to me and my property on my report dated 16-03-2020 against the respondents no. 4 to 6 as being illegal, irregular and violation of legal obligations while discharging the duty under the provisions of criminal procedure code of offends under article 14 and 21 of constitution of india and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to take appropriate action against the respondents nos. 4 to 6 by giving protection to me and my property at the time of digging the bore well at the land in nursery in R.S.No. 488-1 and R.S.487-4 of poranki village, penamaluru mandal, krishna district. IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents nos. 4 to 6 not to obstruct the petitioner to dig a bore well in R.S.NO. 488-1 and R.S.No.487-4 of Poranki Village, Penamaluru mandal, Krishna, District to fetch water to proptect the nursery of the petitioner raised in R.S.NO. 488-1,487-4 of Poranki Village, Penamaluru mandal, Krishna District pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent to give police proptection to the petitioner and his nursaery in R.S.NO. 488-1, 487-4 of Poranki Village, Penamaluru mandal, Krishna District pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PECHATHY RANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not giving protection to me and my property on my report dated 16-03-2020 against the respondents no. 4 to 6 as being illegal, irregular and violation of legal obligations while discharging the duty under the provisions of criminal procedure code of offends under article 14 and 21 of constitution of india and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to take appropriate action against the respondents nos. 4 to 6 by giving protection to me and my property at the time of digging the bore well at the land in nursery in R.S.No. 488-1 and R.S.487-4 of poranki village, penamaluru mandal, krishna district...…” 2. Heard Sri P.Ranga Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 29.07.2025 MH 4 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 34 W.P.No.7840 of 2020 Dated.29.07.2025 MH