Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 113459 (PNJ)

JASWINDER KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/11570/2022 · 2025-02-18

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CM-17932-CWP-2023 and : CM-7204-CWP-2024 in CWP-11570-2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 101+225 CM-17932-CWP-2023 and CM-7204-CWP-2024 in CWP-11570-2022 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.02.2025 JASWINDER KAUR ...... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI *** Present :- Mr. S. S. Swaich, Advocate with Ms. Ishani Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. T. P. S. Chawla, Senior DAG, Punjab. Mr. Munish Kumar Singla, Advocate for respondent No.4. *** Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral) CM-17932-CWP-2023 This application is for placing on record replication to the written statement file by respondent No.4. Application is allowed as prayed for. Replication to the written statement is taken on record, subject to just exceptions. RIMPAL RANI 2025.02.21 17.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CM-17932-CWP-2023 and : CM-7204-CWP-2024 in CWP-11570-2022 CM-7204-CWP-2024 This application is for placing on record the original bank pass book of the petitioner and certified copy of statement/deposition dated 22.05.2023/08/12/2023 in Civil Suit No.621 of 2020 titled as 'Jaswinder Kaur Vs. Gurmeet Kaur' as Annexures P-18 and P-19. Application is allowed as prayed for. Annexures P-18 and P-19 are taken on record, subject to just exceptions. CWP-11570-2022 1. Learned counsel for the parties agree that all the facts which have been pleaded by the respective parties to present their case have not been taken into account while passing the orders in favour of the respondent No.4-senior citizen so as to revert back the land in question i.e. 20 kanals 9 marlas at village Lehal Kalan which was given to the petitioner-daughter by the respondent No.4-senior citizen. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents submit that he has no objection in case both the orders are set aside and the case is remanded back to the Tribunal for adjudication so as to pass appropriate order after considering the respective pleas taken by the parties concerned in their favour as to whether, the application filed by the respondent No.4-senior citizen requires acceptance or not. 3. Keeping in view the agreement between the parties, the impugned orders are set aside and the case is remanded back to the Tribunal RIMPAL RANI 2025.02.21 17.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CM-17932-CWP-2023 and : CM-7204-CWP-2024 in CWP-11570-2022 for fresh adjudication so as to pass appropriate order giving due reasons after considering all the pleas raised by the respective parties so as to arrive at a particular conclusion in respect of the claim made by the respondent No.4- senior citizen qua the property transferred vide the transfer deed Vasika No.1194 dated 06.10.2017 (Annexure P-2) by the senior citizen in favour of the petitioner-daughter. 4. Parties are directed to appear before the Tribunal on 18.03.2025. 5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE 18.02.2025 Rimpal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable : No RIMPAL RANI 2025.02.21 17.04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document