WA No. 1554 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN WA NO. 1554 OF 2022,WA NO. 1561 OF 2022, WA NO. 1563 OF 2022, WA NO. 1564 OF 2022, WA NO. 1566 OF 2022 WA No. 1554 of 2022 1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by its Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Secretariat, Chennai- 9. 2.The District Collector Kancheepuram Dist, Kancheepuram. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer R.D.O.Office, Kancheepuram. Appellant(s) Vs 1. R.Venkedusamy S/o.M.Ramakrishnan, No.16, 4th Main Road, Ramar Nagar, Nanganellur, Chennai-61. 2.The Managing Director SIPCOT, 19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1554 of 2022 Salai, Egmore, Chennai-8. Respondent(s) WA No. 1561 of 2022 1. The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Secretariat, Chennai 09. 2.The District Collector Kancheepuram Dt, Kancheepuram. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer R.D.O.Office, Kancheepuram. Appellant(s) Vs 1. Shaira Imtiaz W/O.G.Intiaz Ahmed, No.155, Greams Road, Chennai 06. 2.The Managing Director SIPCOT, 19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathi Salai, Egmore, Chennai 18. Respondent(s) WA No. 1563 of 2022 1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep by its Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009 2.The District Collector Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1554 of 2022 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer R.D.O. Office, Kancheepuram. Appellant(s) Vs 1. R. Gokula Krishnan No.70B, Oragadam Road, Ambattur, Chennai 53. 2.The Managing Director SIPCOT, 19-A, rukmani Lakshmipathi Salai, Egmore, Chennai 8. Respondent(s) WA No. 1564 of 2022 1. The State Of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9 2.The District Collector, kancheepuram district, kancheepuram 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer R.D.O. Office, kancheepuram Appellant(s) Vs 1. Vivekanandha D Dixit, No.18, Rajasekaran St, Vijaya Lakshmipuram, Ambattur, Chennai 600 053 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1554 of 2022 2.The Managing Director, sipcot 19-a rukmani lakshmipathi salai, egmore, chennai-8 Respondent(s) WA No. 1566 of 2022 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009. 2.The District Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, R.D.O.Office, Kancheepuram. Appellant(s) Vs 1. N.Jayalakshmi, W/o.K.Thankamani, No.1476/A, Garden Avenue, Mugappair, Chennai - 600 037. 2.The Managing Director, SIPCOT, 19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathi Salai, Egmore, Chennai - 8. Respondent(s) WA No. 1554 of 2022 PRAYER To allow the Writ Appeal by setting aside the order passed in WP.No. 7816/2012, dated 23.01.2013. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1554 of 2022 WA No. 1561 of 2022 PRAYER To set aside the order passed in W.P.No.8536/2012 dated 23.01.2013 by this Court. WA No. 1563 of 2022 PRAYER To allow the Writ Appeal by setting aside the order passed in WP No.6900/2012, dated 23.01.2013 and thus render justice. WA No. 1564 of 2022 PRAYER To allow the writ appeal by setting aside the order passed in WP.No. 6901/2012 dated 23.01.2013. WA No. 1566 of 2022 PRAYER To allow the Writ Appeal by setting aside the order passed in W.P.No.8538/2012, dated 23.01.2013. For all petitions For Appellant(s): Mr.P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader For Respondent(s): No appearance for R1 (Not ready in notice in W.A.No.1563 of 2022) Mr.Abishek Murthy for SIPCOT (R2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1554 of 2022 COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The common order dated 23.01.2013 passed in the batch of writ petitions came to be challenged in the present intra-court appeal. 2. The State is the appellant before this Court. The respondents preferred writ petitions challenging the notice issued under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'), mainly on the ground that the District Collector conducted an enquiry under Sub-Section (2) to Section 3 of the Act. Therefore, the notice under Section 3(1) of the Act is to be set aside. In other words, the respondents would contend that the Collector has no jurisdiction to conduct an enquiry and the Act contemplates the Government to conduct enquiry. The Writ Court considered the issue and made a finding that the Collector for the purpose of Section 3(2) is given delegated power to the cause notice and call for objections. This is a specific delegation. It does not empower the Collector to hear and pass orders under Section 3(1) of the Act. The Writ Court has proceeded on the basis that Section 3(1) notification was also issued by the Collector. Therefore, the entire acquisition proceeding was https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1554 of 2022 set aside. 3. The Writ Court placed reliance on the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of J & K Housing Board Vs. Kunwar Sanjay Krishnan Kaul 1 and V.G.P.Housing (P) Ltd Vs. The Secretary to Government (W.P.No.2055 and 2056 of 2010 dated 10.07.2012). In which, the Apex Court held that "It is settled law that when any statutory provision provides a particular manner for doing a particular act, the said thing or act must be done in accordance with the manner prescribed therefore in the Act". The Writ Court proceeded on the basis that both enquiry under Section 3(2) of the Act and notification under Section 3(1) of the Act had been issued by the District Collector and therefore, the entire acquisition is contrary to the procedures contemplated under the Act. 4. The State would submit that the facts are otherwise in the present case. Section 3(2) enquiry was conducted by the District Collector as contemplated under the Act. Based on the enquiry conducted by the District Collector, the Government issued notification under Section 3(1) of the Act. 1 2011 10 SCC 714 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1554 of 2022 Therefore, there is no infirmity, and the Writ Court has committed an error in appreciating the facts and consequently, the present writ appeal is to be allowed. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents would oppose by stating that the Collector has not applied his mind, while sending the proposal for issuance of notice under Section 3(1) of the Act of the Government. Application of mind with reference to the facts are contemplated under the Act, which has not been adopted. Thus, the Writ Court is right in allowing the writ petitions and consequently, the writ appeal is to be rejected. 6. This Court heard the parties to the lis on hand. 7. Section 3 of the Act reads as follows, “3. Power to acquire land. (1) If, at any time in the opinion of the Government, any land is required for any industrial purposes, or for any other purpose in furtherance of the objects of this Act, they may acquire such land by publishing in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1554 of 2022 a notice specifying the particular purpose for which such land is required. (2) Before publishing a notice under sub- section (1), the Government shall, call upon the owner and any other person, who in the opinion of the Government may be interested in such land, to show cause within such time as may be specified in the notice, why the land should not be acquired. The Government shall also cause a public notice to be given in such manner as may be prescribed. (3) The Government may pass an order under sub-section (1) after hearing and considering the cause, if any, shown by the owner or person interested.” 8. The procedures contemplated under Sub-section (2) to Section 3 is a pre-condition for issuance of notice under Section 3(1) of the Act. Two separate notices were issued on 16.12.2009 respectively in respect of the entire extent of the lands sought to be acquired. 9. After providing an opportunity and conducting an enquiry, as contemplated under Sub-section (2) to Section 3 of the Act, a notification https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1554 of 2022 under Section 3(1) was issued by the Government and it was published in Tamil Nadu Government Gazettee dated 04.06.2012. 10. Question arises about the delegation of powers as contemplated under the Act. Section 23(A) of the Act, provides delegation of powers and reads as follows, “23A. [ Delegation of powers. [Inserted by the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes (Amendment) Act, 2005 (Tamil Nadu Act 17 of 2005).] - The Government may, by notification, direct that all the powers under this Act except the powers,- (1)to issue notice under sub-section (1) of section 3; (2)to withdraw the land from acquisition under the first proviso to subsection (1) of section 4; and (3)to make rules under section 25, shall, subject to such conditions, if any, as may be specified in the notification, be exercised by the Collector.]” 11. Except the issuance of the notice under Section 3(1), withdrawal of the land acquisition proceedings and to make rules under Section 25, all other https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1554 of 2022 powers and the procedures to be followed under the Act can be delegated by the Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 23(A) of the Act. In this context, the Tamil Nadu Government notification dated 02.09.2005 issued in G.O.Ms.No.513, Revenue (LA)(1), dated 02.09.2005 reads as under, 12. Therefore, the powers conferred on the Government under Sub- section (2) to Section 3 has been delegated and may be exercised by the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1554 of 2022 District Collector under the Act. In the present case, the enquiry as contemplated under Sub-section (2) to Section 3 was conducted by the District Collector by issuing a public notice and thereafter, based on the proposal submitted by the District Collector, the Government issued 3(1) notification, which is in consonance with the provisions of the Act. Therefore, the Writ Court has misinterpreted the scope of Sections 3(1) and 3(2) of the Act as well as the delegation powers conferred on the Government under Section 23(A)(1) of the Act. 13. Consequently, the common order passed in W.P.Nos.7816, 8536, 6900, 6901 and 8538 of 2012, dated 23.01.2013 are set aside. The reliance placed by the respondents in respect of the order passed in W.A.No.1797 of 2017 dated 24.11.2022 is not applicable. The facts are distinguishable and therefore, the said judgment is of no avail to the respondents to sustain the common writ order impugned. That apart, in the said order, the proceedings has been considered by the Court and facts in the present case are since distinguished, the said judgment has no application. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1554 of 2022 14. The common writ orders made in W.P.Nos.7816, 8536, 6900, 6901 and 8538 of 2012, dated 23.01.2013 are set aside. The present writ appeals are allowed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed. 15. The appellants are bound to follow all further proceedings contemplated under the Act for awarding just compensation under law to the land owners. The land owners are at liberty to submit their representation/objections, if any to the competent authority, while quantifying the compensation or for enhancement or otherwise. (S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.)(C.SARAVANAN J.) 15-09-2025 gd Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1554 of 2022 WA No. 1554 of 2022 To 1.R.Venkedusamy S/o.M.Ramakrishnan, No.16, 4th Main Road, Ramar Nagar, Nanganellur, Chennai-61. 2.The Managing Director SIPCOT, 19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathi Salai, Egmore, Chennai-8. WA No. 1561 of 2022 To 1.Shaira Imtiaz W/O.G.Intiaz Ahmed, No.155, Greams Road, Chennai 06. 2.The Managing Director SIPCOT, 19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathi Salai, Egmore, Chennai 18. WA No. 1566 of 2022 To 1.N.Jayalakshmi, W/o.K.Thankamani, No.1476/A, Garden Avenue, Mugappair, Chennai - https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1554 of 2022 600 037. 2.The Managing Director, SIPCOT, 19-A, Rukmani Lakshmipathi Salai, Egmore, Chennai - 8. WA No. 1563 of 2022 To 1.R. Gokula Krishnan No.70B, Oragadam Road, Ambattur, Chennai 53. 2.The Managing Director SIPCOT, 19-A, rukmani Lakshmipathi Salai, Egmore, Chennai 8. WA No. 1564 of 2022 To 1.Vivekanandha D Dixit, No.18, Rajasekaran St, Vijaya Lakshmipuram, Ambattur, Chennai 600 053 2.The Managing Director, sipcot 19-a rukmani lakshmipathi salai, egmore, chennai-8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WA No. 1554 of 2022 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND C.SARAVANAN J. gd WA NO. 1554 OF 2022,WA NO. 1561 OF 2022, WA NO. 1563 OF 2022, WA NO. 1564 OF 2022, WA NO. 1566 OF 2022 15-09-2025 2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis