Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 113406 (PNJ)

MANJEET AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRM-M/1432/2025 · 2025-02-18

N S Shekhawat

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-1432-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 303 CRM-M-1432-2025 Date of Decision: 18.02.2025 MANJEET AND OTHERS ...PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. S. SHEKHAWAT Present: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Deepak Arya, Advocate for Mr. Tarun Kumar, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3. N. S. SHEKHAWAT , J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, for quashing of an FIR No.259 dated 12.07.2024 under Sections 115, 190, 191(2), 351(3) of BNS and Section 3(2) (va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 registered at Police Station Kalanaur, District Rohtak (Annexure P-1) alongwith all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise/affidavit dated 04.01.2025 (Annexure P-2). VIPIN KUMAR 2025.02.19 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order CRM-M-1432-2025 -2- 2. Vide order dated 14.01.2025, while issuing notice of motion, this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise dated 04.01.2025 (Annexure P-2). 3. Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Rohtak and got their statements recorded. Report dated 27.01.2025 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. 5. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioners. 6. Resultantly, FIR No.259 dated 12.07.2024 under Sections 115, 190, 191(2), 351(3) of BNS and Section 3(2) (va) of VIPIN KUMAR 2025.02.19 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order CRM-M-1432-2025 -3- Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 registered at Police Station Kalanaur, District Rohtak (Annexure P-1) alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners. 18.02.2025. (N. S. SHEKHAWAT) vipin JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIPIN KUMAR 2025.02.19 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order