S.A. Nos.550 & 554 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.09.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR S.A.Nos. 550 and 554 of 2019 1. Velayutham 2. Subramani 3. Raju 4. Annadurai 5. Raja ... Appellants in both the Appeals Vs. 1. Angamuthu 2. The District Collector, Kasba Perambalur District 3. The Tahsildar, Perambalur District. ... Respondents in S.A.No.550/19 Angamuthu ... Respondent in S.A.No.554/19 Prayer in S.A.No.550/2019: The Second Appeal is filed Under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Perambalur, dated 27.02.2009 in A.S.No.72 of 2008 partly 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A. Nos.550 & 554 of 2019 allowing the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif, Perambalur, dated 31.01.2006, in O.S.No.21 of 2004. Prayer in S.A.No.554/2019: The Second Appeal is filed Under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree of the learned Subordinate Judge, Perambalur, dated 27.02.2009 in A.S.No.28 of 2008 partly allowing the judgment and decree of the learned District Munsif, Perambalur, dated 31.01.2006, in O.S.No.184 of 2003 For Appellants : Mr.P.Aswin Karthik for M/s.P.Valliappan - in both the Appeals For Respondents : Mr.Navaneethakrishnan for Mr.S.Kamadevan for R1 in S.A.No.550/19 and respondent in S.A.No.554/2019 ***** JUDGMENT Today, when the matter is called for hearing, it is reported by the learned counsel for the appellants that the appellants 1, 4 and 5 died and in spite of his best efforts, he was not able to get any instructions in this regard. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A. Nos.550 & 554 of 2019 2 It is seen that already this Court has given sufficient opportunities to the learned counsel for the appellants for taking steps for the deceased appellants and finally the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, the learned counsel for the appellants submitted that he could not get instructions with regard to the deceased appellants. 3 Therefore, these Second Appeals stand dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. 09.09.2025 cgi Index:Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No To: 1. The Subordinate Judge, Perambalur. 2. The District Munsif, Perambalur. 3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras. K. RAJASEKAR, J. cgi 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A. Nos.550 & 554 of 2019 S.A.Nos. 550 and 554 of 2019 09.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis