Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 113378 (ALL)

CHHOTE LAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIC/43271/2024 · 2025-01-21

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:9967 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 43271 of 2024 Petitioner :- Chhote Lal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.P.Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. The petitioners have preferred the present petition inter alia with the following prayer:- "i. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Commissioner, Azamgarh Division, Azamgarh/respondent no.2 to decide the stay application dated 07.10.2023 in pending revision no. 202/A computer case no. C202315000001395 u/s 333 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act (Chhote Lal and others Vs. Collector, Azamgarh and others) as well as revision no. 202/A computer case no. C202315000001395 u/s 333 of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act (Chhote Lal and others Vs. Collector, Azamgarh and others,) within short stipulated time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court and till the disposal of the stay application, the parties may be directed to maintain status quo in respect of the land in dispute." 2. After some argument, the learned counsel for the petitioners confined his prayer and prayed that respondent no. 2 may be directed to pass appropriate orders on the Stay Application filed by the petitioners in Case No. 1395 of 2023. 3. It is argued that case in question was filed in the month of October, 2023 and thereafter large number of dates were fixed but no interim relief was granted which is urgently required. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos 1 to 3 and Sri Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 4. 5. In view of the order proposed to be passed herein, no useful purpose would be served by putting the respondents to notice and keeping this petition pending before this Court. However, in case the respondents feels aggrieved by the order his/her right to seek modification/variation of the order is being kept reserved. 6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is disposed of directing the respondent no. 2 or competent authority before whom the aforesaid case is pending to pass appropriate orders on the stay application filed by the petitioners along-with case no. 1395 of 2023 within 4 weeks from the date of production of certified copy before the respondent no.2/competent authority before whom the aforesaid case is pending. 7. Needless to say that respondent no. 2/competent authority will pass the order strictly in accordance with law. Order Date :- 21.1.2025 PS Digitally signed by :- POOJA SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad