Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 11337 (UTT)

SUNITA THUKRAL v. EXCISE COMMISSIONER STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/2512/2023 · 2025-10-15

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:9190 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2512/2023 With WPMS/2494/2023 WPMS/2497/2023 WPMS/2498/2023 WPMS/2499/2023 WPMS/2502/2023 WPMS/2510/2023 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Mohd. Suhail, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners makes a statement at the bar that these writ petitions have become infructuous by efflux of time. 4. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J) 15.10.2025 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.10.15 03:00:15 -07'00' 2025:UHC:9190