SANJAL KUMAR AND SANJU S/O DINESH RAY v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3708/2025 · 2025-05-30
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11331 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 11331 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:22647] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3708/2025 Sanjay Kumar @ Sanju S/o Dinesh Ray, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Narayanpur Police Station Pupari, District Sitabadi, Bihar At Present R/o As A Tenent Flat No. F-1 Chirag Residence, Police Station Pratap- Nagar, Jaipur (At Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5110/2025 Rakesh S/o Babulal Jat, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Ward No. 10 Village Govti, Police Station Khatushyamji District Sikar, At Present R/o At Tenant Flat No. 16 Second Floor, Dwarkapuri Apartment Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 30/05/2025
1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.98/2025 registered at Police Station-Jawahar Circle, District-Jaipur City (East) for the offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) and 303(2) of BNS, 2023. Since both the bail applications have arisen from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order.
[2025:RJ-JP:22647] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3708/2025]
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that as per the prosecution story injuries caused to the injured-Nandkishore was by blunt weapon but none of the injurious are dangerous to life. Petitioners are behind the bars since 27.02.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Sanjay Kumar @ Sanju S/o Dinesh Ray and Rakesh S/o Babulal Jat shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/136-137